REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE: GAINING MOMENTUM IN CLINICAL RESEARCH

Real-World Evidence: Gaining Momentum in Clinical Research

Sidney Lane, PhD
Clinical and Regulatory Affairs Project Lead
, Clinical Research Strategies

December 2024

Traditional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as the gold standard in clinical data generation. However, RCTs only have approximately 10% likelihood of commercial success for interventional therapies(1), reflecting stalled progress in patient care and an abysmal return on investment for stakeholders. Several factors contribute to this low success rate(2), notably the restrictive nature of RCTs, which are often conducted in limited patient populations and controlled environments that do not reflect everyday clinical practice.

To address these limitations, regulatory authorities are focused on expanding evidence generation to include real-world evidence (RWE). RWE consists of data collected as part of routine healthcare, providing valuable insights into treatment effectiveness and patient outcomes in diverse real-world settings. By integrating RWE, we can bridge the gap between clinical research and clinical practice, enhancing our understanding of therapies in real-world scenarios.

RWE: Past and Present

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines RWE as “clinical evidence regarding the usage and potential benefits or risks of a medical product via analysis of real-world data (RWD)” with RWD defined as “data relating to patient health status and delivery of healthcare routinely collected from various sources.” RWD includes data generated from electronic health records (EHRs), routine clinical practice, patient registries, claims databases, and other sources outside the controlled environment of an RCT. When RWD is collected and analyzed as part of a non-interventional study design, it has the potential to lead to the generation of RWE which has many uses, such as market access, reimbursement, safety surveillance, removal of cautions or warnings, label expansion, and/or regulatory decision-making.

Historically, RWE has primarily been utilized for post-market safety surveillance, registries and other phase 4 trials, and for obtaining special designations for medical products, particularly for indications of oncology and rare diseases. The 21st Century Cures Act, enacted in 2016, initiated a federal effort to broaden the use of RWE in clinical studies, resulting in a substantial increase in RWE applications and regulatory frameworks. It is reported that between 2019-2021, the number of FDA-approved applications containing RWE increased from 75% in 2019 to 96% in 20213. Since the Cures Act, the FDA has released ten guidances on the use of RWE in clinical trials, including three released in 2023 and one released in 2024, underscoring the FDAs commitment to integrating RWE. Throughout these guidances, the FDA has maintained a consistent emphasis on quality (data sources are relevant, reliable, and robust), effective study design (appropriate to generate reliable RWE), stakeholder engagement (continued collaboration between industry, academia, and regulators as the RWE landscape evolves), and regulatory use (permitting RWE as evidence for a variety of approvals).

As RWE gains broader acceptance, its applications have expanded significantly. RWE is now increasingly accepted as supportive evidence for label expansion and modification, new drug and device applications for a wider range of indications, and beyond special designations. Further, RWE studies are now being employed earlier in the clinical trial pipeline and are often conducted alongside RCTs to generate data on the endpoints observed in the RCTs across a broader population earlier in the life cycle of the product.

Prominent examples include the FDA’s 2018 approval of the Hemospray Endoscopic Hemostat (DEN170015), where RWE from a registry study and two observational studies acted as the sole clinical evidence for this successful de novo application. Similarly, in 2023, the FDA approved the Biological License Application (BLA) for IXCHIQ (BL 125777/0 [PDF file]) (VALNEVA Austria GmbH), a chikungunya virus vaccine, in 2023. IXCHIQ was approved under Accelerated Approval designation based on clinical data from three interventional studies and the Sponsor’s proposed post-market confirmatory RWE studies, which will run concurrently with their subsequent pragmatic RCTs.

Other regulatory bodies are also developing RWE guidance and frameworks. In 2023, Health Canada released the Guidance for Reporting Real World Evidence4 which laid the foundation for use of RWE for regulatory approval and standardized reporting of RWE. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recently established an online RWD repository of observational data sources from EU hospitals and healthcare centers, known as Data Analysis and Real World Interrogation Network (DARWIN)5, and the EMA is expected to release an updated RWE regulatory guidance in 2025. Additionally, the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) addresses RWE in Annex 2 of the upcoming E6(R3) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The draft for Annex 2 [PDF file] was released for public consideration in November 2024.

Table 1 represents prominent regulatory authorities who have begun to enable discussion for RWE and it is expected that others will defer to these authorities for adoption.

TABLE 1:

Regulatory Bodies Who Consider RWE in their Decision Making

European Medicines Agency (EMA)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Health Canada (HC)

Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)

Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

National Medical Products Administration in China (NMPA)

UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)

CRS AND RWE

The highly experienced CRS team of regulatory and clinical operational professionals recognize the transformative potential of RWE in shaping the future of clinical research and regulatory decision-making. With extensive experience navigating the RWE regulatory landscape, we have successfully assisted clients with developing registries, designing and managing observational studies, and preparing RWE regulatory submissions and strategies. We offer comprehensive services tailored to our clients’ unique needs, and our commitment to quality and rigor in clinical management and regulatory strategy positions us as an excellent choice for any Sponsors wishing to incorporate RWE needs.

Abaloparatide (US Sponsor)

Osteoporosis

 

OBJECTIVE
Prepare a RWE study as a substitute for a failed RCT for EMA MAA

OUTCOME
Data generated from the RWE study was used to support the 2022 approval of abaloparatide, marketed in the EU under the trade name Eladynos, for the treatment of osteoporosis(6)

Dermal Topical System (European Sponsor)

Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN)

OBJECTIVE
Contribute to the design and execute a RWE study of an approved pain drug to demonstrate potential for opioid reduction

OUTCOME
Developed a protocol for a phase 4, multi-center, observational, prospective study for 2-year program.

Health Tech Company and De-Identified Data Partner (US Sponsor)

RWD/RWE: All

OBJECTIVE
Prepare a protocol for defining and leveraging de-ID data / re-ID for Preparatory to Research, HIPAA Waiver, or Exemption

OUTCOME
Generated protocol and supported client through IRB Opinion Letter.

Tech Company with Claims Dataset for Pharmaceutical Research (US Sponsor)

RWD/RWE: All

 

OBJECTIVE
Prepare a white paper on Extended Safety Signal Detection for Client Base on Hypothetical Situations

OUTCOME
Completion and publication of white paper.

Injectable Anticoagulant (European Sponsor)

Thromboembolism

 

OBJECTIVE
Leveraging off-label RWE for pediatric extrapolation to support label expansion

OUTCOME
Prepare a prior approval supplement for the FDA using RWE to support label modification.

Extracorporeal Blood Processing System (Asian Sponsor)

LDL - Apheresis

 

OBJECTIVE
Review legacy data and literature to improve label, remove contraindication

OUTCOME
Prepared unique strategies and assess results of current registry and retrospective case reviews​.

Surgical Sealant (US Sponsor)

An Adjunct to Hemostasis

 

OBJECTIVE
Utilize data from a failed RCT + literature + RWE to address gap in efficacy and support label expansion and removal of warning label​

OUTCOME
Prepared five unique strategies; currently conducting RWE feasibility assessments for label expansion.

Implantable Neuromodulation Device (US Sponsor)

Chronic Neuropathy

 

OBJECTIVE
Complete clinical monitoring, data analysis, and preparation of the CSR for a prospective, multicenter, single-arm RWE registry study.

OUTCOME
Delivered final CSR, trends in new literature demonstrate long-term pain reduction is too challenging​.

References

  1. Mullard, A. Parsing clinical success rates. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery Volume 15, 447 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.136
  2. Purpura, C.A., Garry, E.M., Honig, N., Case, A. and Rassen, J.A. (2022), The Role of Real-World Evidence in FDA-Approved New Drug and Biologics License Applications. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 111: 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2474 
  3. Wong CH, Siah KW, Lo AW. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics. 2019 Apr 1; 20(2):273-286. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069. Erratum in: Biostatistics. 2019 Apr 1;20(2):366. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy072. PMID: 29394327; PMCID: PMC6409418
  4. Guidance for reporting real-world evidence. CDA. (2023, May). https://www.cda-amc.ca/guidance-reporting-real-world-evidence 
  5. A vision for use of real-world evidence in EU medicines regulation. European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2021, November 24). European Medicines Agency (EMA). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/vision-use-real-world-evidence-eu-medicines-regulation
  6. Davenport C, Gravel P, Wang Y, Williams SA, Wieland A, Mitlak B. Real-World Evidence to Support the Registration of a New Osteoporosis Medicinal Product in Europe. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):505-518. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00616-7. Epub 2024 Feb 10. PMID: 38341388; PMCID: PMC11043175

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Sidney Lane, PhD

Clinical and Regulatory Affairs Project Lead

As Project Lead, Sidney bridges the gap between clinical trials and regulatory strategy across multiple therapeutic areas, including infectious disease, oncology, rare diseases, and critical care medicine. She acts as lead for phase I-IV clinical trials for biologics and pharmaceuticals, pilot and pivotal medical device studies, healthy volunteer studies, and post-market RWE studies, with extensive experience managing international studies across Europe, Asia, and Australia.

Sidney earned her doctorate in Microbiology and Immunology from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, where she conducted research on immune dysfunction and host-microbe interactions, resulting in several peer-reviewed publications. Outside of work, Sidney enjoys playing with her dog, yoga, bouldering, and keeping up with her favorite home renovation shows.

Sidney Lane, PhD

SIDNEY LANE, PhD
Clinical and Regulatory Affairs Project Lead

Share This